through my tracing of how people come to look at my pictures, i discovered that i'm the posterboy for sourdough bread! as of this moment, the picture of sourdough bread in the upper left here:
http://www.mahalo.com/sourdough-bread
is mine.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/8748128%40N02/3675766088
great!
except. . . that picture is licensed. the license states that there must be an attribution. i'm ok with a click-through being an attribution, and further down the page the same picture is shown with a click-through. however, in the upper left, there's nothing. here's the license in case you're interested:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/deed.en
so, i've emailed them, saying the above, as well:
"please either update your page generation software to allow click-throughs on the picture reproduced on the upper left hand side, or cease using pictures that require attribution in that location."
d'ya think i'll get a response? i'll post again if and when i do.
Saturday, August 08, 2009
Friday, July 10, 2009
Friday, October 03, 2008
about the biden/palin debate:
am i the only one who finds it completely scary that palin thinks cheney has done a great and proper job with his wacky interpretation of the vice presidency and his belief that the office has super untouchable powers?
(i just did a search: apparently not. but i did want to register my complete aghastness.)
am i the only one who finds it completely scary that palin thinks cheney has done a great and proper job with his wacky interpretation of the vice presidency and his belief that the office has super untouchable powers?
(i just did a search: apparently not. but i did want to register my complete aghastness.)
this is what i wish obama or biden would say the next time mccain or palin says "barack obama still won't admit the surge worked."
ok.
fine.
the surge worked.
so let's get out.
let's get out responsibly but quickly. let's get out making sure the iraqis can maintain their freedom, if they want it. but let's get out.
[shuts up. turns to moderator.]
ok.
fine.
the surge worked.
so let's get out.
let's get out responsibly but quickly. let's get out making sure the iraqis can maintain their freedom, if they want it. but let's get out.
[shuts up. turns to moderator.]
Tuesday, September 09, 2008
two things:
1. if i ever get a grant, i will blog sometimes. maybe even start a comic strip. i might do it! watch out! it will no longer be two plus years between posts!
2. saint etienne is apparently the ideal grant-writing music for me. grant-writing is the reason that they are, by far, the most played artist on my lastfm profile.
that is all.
1. if i ever get a grant, i will blog sometimes. maybe even start a comic strip. i might do it! watch out! it will no longer be two plus years between posts!
2. saint etienne is apparently the ideal grant-writing music for me. grant-writing is the reason that they are, by far, the most played artist on my lastfm profile.
that is all.
Sunday, August 27, 2006
report from linkfest
yesterday, i and the family went to linkfest, and i investigated my charges of poor pedestrian and bike-friendliness of the shrewsbury station (see immediately previous post).
thankfully, it turns out that there is a way to cross the busy street to get to the station safely. however, here is what you have to do if you are approaching from the most populated area:
1. walk past the station in its entirety.
2. cross traffic once.
3. cross traffic a second time.
4. walk up the *only* sidewalk from the side of the road available for the entire stop. that's right: there are 3 lanes total for cars going in and three lanes total for cars going out, and 1 sidewalk.
5. cross traffic again.
so, it is certainly possible to cross safely, but it is not convenient or sensibly planned.
similarly, the forest park stop has a crosswalk for people who want to walk to the parking lot, but no crosswalk for people who want to walk to. . . forest park, which is perhaps .25 miles away.
i am a big fan of public transportation, and i want everyone to use the metro system. but i also want the metro system to remember that it is supposed to be serving *people*. at the moment, a martian would be forgiven for believing it serves *cars*.
yesterday, i and the family went to linkfest, and i investigated my charges of poor pedestrian and bike-friendliness of the shrewsbury station (see immediately previous post).
thankfully, it turns out that there is a way to cross the busy street to get to the station safely. however, here is what you have to do if you are approaching from the most populated area:
1. walk past the station in its entirety.
2. cross traffic once.
3. cross traffic a second time.
4. walk up the *only* sidewalk from the side of the road available for the entire stop. that's right: there are 3 lanes total for cars going in and three lanes total for cars going out, and 1 sidewalk.
5. cross traffic again.
so, it is certainly possible to cross safely, but it is not convenient or sensibly planned.
similarly, the forest park stop has a crosswalk for people who want to walk to the parking lot, but no crosswalk for people who want to walk to. . . forest park, which is perhaps .25 miles away.
i am a big fan of public transportation, and i want everyone to use the metro system. but i also want the metro system to remember that it is supposed to be serving *people*. at the moment, a martian would be forgiven for believing it serves *cars*.
Friday, August 25, 2006
some background: the st. louis metro system recently completed an expansion of its light rail system, set to open this weekend. the terminating station is in shrewsbury, near webster groves, and the system goes straight to washington university, where i work (and which has granted me a free metro pass). but here's the question: is there any way to get from where i live to the station, which is 3-4 miles away?
well, the metro claims that a variety of bus routes will be changing, and that, magically, there will be a bus that goes about a quarter mile past our place, straight to the metro. they haven't bothered updating that route so i can see how often it goes, but i trust them, for now.
how about by bike? today i rode to the station on my bike. here is my route. i have purposefully left it in maps form so you can see why google maps (and more particularly the pedometer i used here) is the *only* way to figure out bike routes around here. take a look at the area around the park: it looks like there's no way to get where i want to go. now click the "hybrid" button and zoom in. you can see the little path i took, right down, if you zoom in really close, to the little wooden bridge. apparently civic planners in st. louis are aware that pedestrians and bikers would like to be able to get to parks. good. it is even possible to see a route through the seminary that i took to get home--although this is technically partly on private property, and involves a very steep bit through the grass.
other bits of interest: on the way, on jackson road, i passed a house with so many plaster statutes i thought they must be selling them. also, the route goes through knights of columbus court. seriously? knights of columbus court? you're joking, right? much of knights of columbus court is taken up by a da-com office. so i guess if i want an office supply contract on the way home, i'm all set.
and the station? not so good. this thing has hundreds of parking spaces, but i only found one bike rack. with room for three bikes, tops. seriously. i guess there might be another rack somewhere, but i didn't see it. metro is probably figuring that most people who bike to the station will also want to take their bikes on the train. this is true of me. thus, i do not complain too much.
however, here's the thing: i've found a very safe route for my bike. i even found a traffic light route across lacede station road. it is very safe all the way up to about 100 yards away from the station, and then it falls apart. i can do the illegal but safe standby of hitting the sidewalk, but then i have to get across a four-lane road to get to the station. question: how, exactly, does metro think that people who live in shrewsbury are going to get to the station? do they all have to take buses or drive cars? is no one going to walk? there *seems* to be a traffic light further up the road, and this might allow safe passage for pedestrians and somewhat safer passage for bikes. but this is not in the least convenient for pedestrians: none will be coming from that direction. this is clearly all set up for cars.
i have emailed them to ask, among other things, what they expect pedestrians to do. do you think i'll get an answer? i was just starting to get excited about st. louis maybe finally getting serious about public transport, but it's a little disheartening that it seems to focus almost exclusively on public transport of people who would really rather drive.
update: the bus schedules are actually available, just not on the main bus schedule page. i received a same-day response from customer service, but the lady there says she's been too busy with emails to actually set eyes on the station. so, as for how pedestrians are supposed to safely cross a street with no apparent crosswalks and four lanes of traffic, no answer yet.
well, the metro claims that a variety of bus routes will be changing, and that, magically, there will be a bus that goes about a quarter mile past our place, straight to the metro. they haven't bothered updating that route so i can see how often it goes, but i trust them, for now.
how about by bike? today i rode to the station on my bike. here is my route. i have purposefully left it in maps form so you can see why google maps (and more particularly the pedometer i used here) is the *only* way to figure out bike routes around here. take a look at the area around the park: it looks like there's no way to get where i want to go. now click the "hybrid" button and zoom in. you can see the little path i took, right down, if you zoom in really close, to the little wooden bridge. apparently civic planners in st. louis are aware that pedestrians and bikers would like to be able to get to parks. good. it is even possible to see a route through the seminary that i took to get home--although this is technically partly on private property, and involves a very steep bit through the grass.
other bits of interest: on the way, on jackson road, i passed a house with so many plaster statutes i thought they must be selling them. also, the route goes through knights of columbus court. seriously? knights of columbus court? you're joking, right? much of knights of columbus court is taken up by a da-com office. so i guess if i want an office supply contract on the way home, i'm all set.
and the station? not so good. this thing has hundreds of parking spaces, but i only found one bike rack. with room for three bikes, tops. seriously. i guess there might be another rack somewhere, but i didn't see it. metro is probably figuring that most people who bike to the station will also want to take their bikes on the train. this is true of me. thus, i do not complain too much.
however, here's the thing: i've found a very safe route for my bike. i even found a traffic light route across lacede station road. it is very safe all the way up to about 100 yards away from the station, and then it falls apart. i can do the illegal but safe standby of hitting the sidewalk, but then i have to get across a four-lane road to get to the station. question: how, exactly, does metro think that people who live in shrewsbury are going to get to the station? do they all have to take buses or drive cars? is no one going to walk? there *seems* to be a traffic light further up the road, and this might allow safe passage for pedestrians and somewhat safer passage for bikes. but this is not in the least convenient for pedestrians: none will be coming from that direction. this is clearly all set up for cars.
i have emailed them to ask, among other things, what they expect pedestrians to do. do you think i'll get an answer? i was just starting to get excited about st. louis maybe finally getting serious about public transport, but it's a little disheartening that it seems to focus almost exclusively on public transport of people who would really rather drive.
update: the bus schedules are actually available, just not on the main bus schedule page. i received a same-day response from customer service, but the lady there says she's been too busy with emails to actually set eyes on the station. so, as for how pedestrians are supposed to safely cross a street with no apparent crosswalks and four lanes of traffic, no answer yet.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
